Jun 15, 2006

They tell me the Times review was very positive today. I am not reading it but I am very happy to hear this. Especially after so so many theatres rejected this play.

13 comments:

  1. They're right; I just read it. Congrats! Glad it's going well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh Go On. Read it. DOOoooo it. Dooooo it.

    DOOOOOOO IT!

    It's good. It will, of course, corrupt the vision of your play and ruin your integrity.

    Still.

    Read it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not going to read it right now but maybe 10 years from now I'll wish I had.

    Thank you both.

    A

    ReplyDelete
  4. Congratulations, Adam!

    And c'maaaaaaahn! Just a peek. Give the review a peek. C'maaaaaaaaaahn!

    An idiot,

    James

    ReplyDelete
  5. Peer pressure. It is the World-Eater.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will eat you world and will not read a damn thing

    ReplyDelete
  7. Are you going to wait ten years to read it?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You should bury it in a time capsule and then in ten years we can have a party and dig it up!

    ReplyDelete
  9. A hearty congratulations. Glad to hear it's going so well!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Congrats! I was on vacation with the husband and he just happened to pick up the New York Times so he could peruse the Business section. I casually glanced over Arts & Entertainment. I was so happy to see that not only is my ridiculously talented college chum such a success, but that a newspaper like the Times is smart enough to recognize and appreciate it!

    Best,
    Chris Wolfskehl (nee Saad)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Ripley and Christinya! And Heidi, I don't have a backyard at the moment. Maybe i'll read it in Sept after all the craziness is over.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Again, congrats on the show. I saw it last night. It was just as fun to watch as it was to read.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.