Jan 8, 2008

voting machines

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

"Introduced after the 2000 hanging-chad debacle, the machines were originally intended to add clarity to election results. But in hundreds of instances, the result has been precisely the opposite: they fail unpredictably, and in extremely strange ways; voters report that their choices "flip" from one candidate to another before their eyes; machines crash or begin to count backward; votes simply vanish. (In the 80-person town of Waldenburg, Ark., touch-screen machines tallied zero votes for one mayoral candidate in 2006 — even though he's pretty sure he voted for himself.)"

2 comments:

  1. That is why I have been using absentee ballots since 1984... I know how computers are only as smart as the people programming them.

    Cheers,

    Michael

    ReplyDelete
  2. yeah or they could vote the way the programmer wants them to vote.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.