Adam Szymkowicz

    Saturday, October 07, 2006

    an Email I received

    Dear Juilliard Mafia,

    We are writing to warn you about a development at the
    O'Neill Playwrights Festival, a situation so serious
    that we can no longer recommend that you send your
    scripts there, and hope to discourage you from
    mentoring or assisting them in any way. The problem
    is this - from now on, the O'Neill Board is determined
    to demand a percentage of the playwright's subsidiary
    income IN PERPETUITY from any play accepted for
    presentation at the O'Neill. This means that for four

    days of rehearsal, and a presentation with actors
    using scripts, you will owe them a permanent
    percentage of your income from that play. This is so
    patently unfair, and so clearly against their own
    mission statement, that we can only assume they have
    lost their minds, or perhaps decided to think of
    themselves as commercial producers instead of the
    generous, helpful organization they used to be,
    devoted to playwrights and their work.

    They tried to demand this participation from two
    writers this summer, but were thwarted by efforts by
    the Dramatists Guild, and the agent for two of the
    writers, John Buzzetti. Both writers said they would

    pull their work if this provision was attached and the
    O'Neill backed down, saying that since no warning was
    given, it wasn't fair to ask for the percentage. But
    last month they announced they would be demanding the
    percentage from the writers whose work was accepted
    this summer.

    We urge you not to submit your scripts to the O'Neill.
    We urge you to talk to your agents about this, and
    not participate in any way. We are afraid this is the
    beginning of the end for an institution we have all
    admired and cherished. This is part of a disturbing
    trend in "development" organizations, where
    playwrights are increasingly expected to pay for
    their productions, in spite of the fact that
    those organizations raise money and get grants
    claiming that they exist to help playwrights. More
    and more, it's looking like those organizations exist
    to support themselves, not their writers. In this
    regard, beware of any contest that charges you more
    than $15 to apply, because that's about what readers
    are being paid these days.

    Over and over again in class, we urged you to get over
    feeling grateful, and defend yourself in situations
    where you sense you are being taken advantage of. So
    this is just us saying it again. Do not give your
    work away, and do not pay somebody to produce it, and

    do not grant rights that are excessive. Do not
    encumber your work with percentages to people who
    think they deserve them just because they recognized
    you were good.

    Please pass this information along to anyone you think
    could use it. The only way to impress on the O'Neill
    the insanity of what they are doing, is to deny them
    the plays that they need. Many of us have tried
    talking to them, and they are not listening. So we
    are taking this step, and encouraging all writing
    teachers in America to contact their students in the
    same way.

    All our best,

    Chris Durang and Marsha Norman

    posted by Adam at 11:15 AM

    6 Comments:

    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Wow.

    Don't know what's crazier - what the O'Neill is doing, the tone of the letter or that it was written by Durang and Norman.

    Wow.

    12:07 PM  
    Anonymous Laura said...

    Thanks for posting this. I got the email as well. I'm *so glad* I got it before I sent my work out.

    O'Neill had a problem back in 2003/2004, which I covered for my theater column. I don't know what the deal is with them. Maybe somebody over there thinks they should get a raise.

    Seriously, $35 submission fee to read my work? Sheesh.

    5:31 PM  
    Blogger Jaime said...

    1. That's insane.

    2. O'Neill readers don't get paid anything, so the idea that your submission fee goes to readers at all is, well, wrong. Sadly.

    3. While, in terms of the O'Neill, I think the letter's right, it isn't always correct to say that development should garner no rewards. I know a dramaturg who's been developing a musical, with the writers and a director, for a year and a half. When it gets a life, he gets nothing. And yet it never would have been in a position to be produced with out his (sizeable) input. Of course, you can't give everyone a piece of the pie, and this isn't the same situation as an institution giving four days and two readings, but it's just another side of the issue. A very fuzzy, tricky issue that, for purposes of strengthening the argument against the O'Neill's move, might have been oversimplified by the letter.

    10:00 PM  
    Blogger hpmelon said...

    Hey Adam,

    Theaterboy is currently reporting on this one and trying to get to the bottom of it...

    http://theaterboy.typepad.com/theaterboy/2006/10/drama_at_the_on.html

    The info he is getting is a tad different.

    12:20 PM  
    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    I've been told by Wendy Goldberg that this is not true - that this was briefly on the table in May 2006 but then quickly pulled. Whether one believes that version of events - or that it was pulled in response to this outcry - it's no long the policy at the O'Neill.

    The person in charge of fundraising at the O'Neill is incompetent and should be fired. While the larger probelm is a dearth of arts funding, she is not up to the task, and I think that the blame for these perennial large-scale embarrassments to the OPC can be largely be laid at her feet.

    12:59 PM  
    Blogger Adam said...

    Jaime brings up an important point. are freelance dramaturgs expected to work for free? Or would they get sub rights from the playwright. I think if the playwright brings in this person to help, the playwright has some obligation. If they belong to a theatre, then they are perhaps salaried. It's hard to say. I know there are director and companies that want sub rights. If there was only more money for everyone perhaps this would be less of a concern.

    2:14 PM  

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    About Me

    My Photo
    Name: Adam Szymkowicz
    Location: United States

    adamszymkowicz at yahoo dot com

    View my complete profile

    Archives

    • March 2005
    • April 2005
    • May 2005
    • June 2005
    • July 2005
    • August 2005
    • September 2005
    • October 2005
    • November 2005
    • December 2005
    • January 2006
    • February 2006
    • March 2006
    • April 2006
    • May 2006
    • June 2006
    • July 2006
    • August 2006
    • September 2006
    • October 2006
    • November 2006
    • December 2006
    • January 2007
    • February 2007
    • March 2007
    • April 2007
    • May 2007
    • June 2007
    • July 2007
    • August 2007
    • September 2007
    • October 2007
    • November 2007
    • December 2007
    • January 2008
    • February 2008
    • March 2008
    • April 2008
    • May 2008
    • June 2008
    • July 2008
    • August 2008
    • September 2008
    • October 2008
    • November 2008
    • December 2008
    • January 2009
    • February 2009
    • March 2009
    • April 2009
    • May 2009
    • June 2009
    • July 2009

    Powered by Blogger


     

    >
    Google
    >