Thursday, June 15, 2006

They tell me the Times review was very positive today. I am not reading it but I am very happy to hear this. Especially after so so many theatres rejected this play.

13 comments:

frank's wild lunch said...

They're right; I just read it. Congrats! Glad it's going well.

Freeman said...

Oh Go On. Read it. DOOoooo it. Dooooo it.

DOOOOOOO IT!

It's good. It will, of course, corrupt the vision of your play and ruin your integrity.

Still.

Read it.

Adam said...

I'm not going to read it right now but maybe 10 years from now I'll wish I had.

Thank you both.

A

Jamespeak said...

Congratulations, Adam!

And c'maaaaaaahn! Just a peek. Give the review a peek. C'maaaaaaaaaahn!

An idiot,

James

Freeman said...

Peer pressure. It is the World-Eater.

Adam said...

I will eat you world and will not read a damn thing

Brikin Blog said...

Are you going to wait ten years to read it?

Adam said...

should i wait ten years?

Brikin Blog said...

You should bury it in a time capsule and then in ten years we can have a party and dig it up!

RB Ripley said...

A hearty congratulations. Glad to hear it's going so well!

Anonymous said...

Congrats! I was on vacation with the husband and he just happened to pick up the New York Times so he could peruse the Business section. I casually glanced over Arts & Entertainment. I was so happy to see that not only is my ridiculously talented college chum such a success, but that a newspaper like the Times is smart enough to recognize and appreciate it!

Best,
Chris Wolfskehl (nee Saad)

Adam said...

Thanks Ripley and Christinya! And Heidi, I don't have a backyard at the moment. Maybe i'll read it in Sept after all the craziness is over.

Jamespeak said...

Again, congrats on the show. I saw it last night. It was just as fun to watch as it was to read.